Introducing Public Talks 1:24 secs

Professor Roger Fisher, Harvard Negotiating Project: “I support (these) recommendations that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hold hearings on “Public Talks.” original letter

Mr. Chris Bronk, PhD, James A Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University:“I sincerely hope the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will hear your concept, as well as others, as it collaborates with the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Institute for Peace and other agencies of the foreign affairs community . . . “ original letter

Senator Akaka, Hawaii: "The idea of Public Talks is intriguing and warrants further discussion. Rest assured I will keep your thoughts in mind should the Senate consider legislation related to this issue.” original letter

Huffington Post: "A Truly Original Foreign Policy Idea: Public Talks" original article

Gordon Feller, Urban Age Institute: “Public Talks is an approach to conflict resolution that is entirely different and far more expansive than anything else in the field.”
original letter

Professor Patrick Hatcher, UC Berkeley, Political Science: “ . . . It is unique in that (the Institute) suggests using the media to make public a set of terms before, and while, they are negotiating, hence reaching a larger audience who can use public opinion for peace.”
original letter

David Smock, Vice-President of the Center for Mediation and Conflict Resolution, United States Institute of Peace, a non-partisan institution established by Congress: “The notion of Public Talks is a very interesting idea and worthy of further exploration.”
original letter

Professor Mirta Mulhare, State University of New York: “The strategy you suggest would represent an evolutionary summit, bringing out negotiations into the open and introducing the people into the process. The possibilities for use are endless.”
original letter

Professor E. Phillip Morgan, Monterey Institute for International Studies: “ . . . your proposal to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for a new form of dialogue (“Public Talks”) represents a serious, innovative departure from past practice by which political conflicts are represented, defined and treated (or not) in the public arenas of the US and multilateral organizations.”
original letter

Joel Hefley, Republican member of the House from Colorado (1987- 2007) Chair of the House Ethics Committee: " I know how frustrating it can be to have the normal diplomatic process break down with no place else to go . . . I feel that it (Public Talks) should be fully explored. I would therefore encourage the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee to hold hearings to explore the viability of Public Talks."
original letter

 

 

 

Public Talks is a new form of international dialogue that will strengthen the process of democracy worldwide

To Students in Universities and Colleges around the World:

You are invited to participate in an unprecedented event that will happen on six continents over the course of one day.  We are asking university organizations worldwide to post a founding document "The Idea: Public Talks" on the door of their library on:

October 6, 2010

This catalyzing event is designed to spur many leaders in the U.S. and around the world to endorse the action called for in the Open Letter: President Obama

The founding document for Public Talks that will be placed on these library doors is at the end of this page.  A brief summary:

Public Talks is a structured process that would only come into existence after an overseeing body creates the rules and terms for a level communication playing field between two sides of a conflict. This organization would also define when this process should and should not be used.

The central communications instrument of Public Talks is a series of magazine-size "Dialogue Documents" distributed both online and through at least one major print media. This new “challenge media” would include each side's interpretation of history, questions to one's adversary, fundamental assumptions, negotiating positions and other content relevant to international conflicts.

Once Public Talks is established and that failed negotiating process fulfills the criteria of the overseeing body, either party to a conflict could unilaterally put their Dialogue Document before the world public.  If the side challenged refuses to participate in this new form of political dialogue, it risks having its opponent’s historical narrative widely accepted as true.

Public Talks is not intended to supplant private talks, but rather to revitalize and infuse this traditional process with a greater sense of urgency.  All sides would know that there is a new communication structure, which would formally continue the negotiating process after private talks failed. 

An Overseeing Organization: To be widely accepted internationally, representatives of many nations would need to participate in the creation of the rules and terms for Public Talks.  The U.S., U.N., E.U., Norway, Sweden, Switzerland are just a few of the possible entities that could establish this new structure.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Committee of Foreign Affairs: These committees are the path by which U.S. organizations can petition their government to establish a far ranging process such as Public Talks.  For this reason, some comments from experts on this page have called for hearings at these Committees. 

Once Public Talks has been institutionalized, the world’s communications environment will have changed. A new process would come into existence that would focus on the underlying causes of conflicts and not simply the symptoms. Support for Public Talks will be widespread as this direct clash of opinions will result in a greater public recognition of historical truth.

The University Event:

The Objective: To create an unprecedented worldwide event that will precipitate a series of cascading actions and reactions whereby citizens across the globe would understand that there is a new form of international negotiations that could – and often should – augment traditional negotiations. 

Web conferences: Preceding this October 6, 2010 date, the Institute will organize and pay for a series of web conferences with groups of participating schools.

No Expenses: There are absolutely no fees or costs associated with this event or these web conference calls for any of the participating university organizations.

“The Idea: Public Talks” that will be placed on the library doors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Why Students?
2:34 secs

 


Africa:

Egypt

South Africa

Asia:

India

China

Europe:

Ireland

Italy

Portugal

Spain

Sweden

United Kingdom

North America:

Mexico

United States

Oceania:

Australia

New Zealand

South America:

Argentina

Brazil

Chile

Colombia

Peru




Mr. Doug Turner. Republican gubernatorial candidate for New Mexico and formerly an International Affairs Fellow for the Council on Foreign Affairs:
“I am intrigued and excited about the new concept for public diplomacy that your organization has outlined in its proposal for ‘Public Talks.’ . . .”
original letter

Congresswoman Woolsey, Democratic member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs: “Public Talks is an interesting proposal that should be looked at closely and discussed as an alternative to conflict. . . . Innovative thinking, like that of the Institute, is essential to moving towards a stable and secure future for all the world’s people.”
original letter