Introducing Public Talks 1:24 secs

Professor Roger Fisher, Harvard Negotiating Project: “I support (these) recommendations that the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hold hearings on “Public Talks.” original letter

Mr. Chris Bronk, PhD, James A Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University:“I sincerely hope the Senate Foreign Relations Committee will hear your concept, as well as others, as it collaborates with the U.S. Department of State, U.S. Institute for Peace and other agencies of the foreign affairs community . . . “ original letter

Senator Akaka, Hawaii: "The idea of Public Talks is intriguing and warrants further discussion. Rest assured I will keep your thoughts in mind should the Senate consider legislation related to this issue.” original letter

Huffington Post: "A Truly Original Foreign Policy Idea: Public Talks" original article

Gordon Feller, Urban Age Institute: “Public Talks is an approach to conflict resolution that is entirely different and far more expansive than anything else in the field.”
original letter

Professor Patrick Hatcher, UC Berkeley, Political Science: “ . . . It is unique in that (the Institute) suggests using the media to make public a set of terms before, and while, they are negotiating, hence reaching a larger audience who can use public opinion for peace.”
original letter

David Smock, Vice-President of the Center for Mediation and Conflict Resolution, United States Institute of Peace, a non-partisan institution established by Congress: “The notion of Public Talks is a very interesting idea and worthy of further exploration.”
original letter

Professor Mirta Mulhare, State University of New York: “The strategy you suggest would represent an evolutionary summit, bringing out negotiations into the open and introducing the people into the process. The possibilities for use are endless.”
original letter

Professor E. Phillip Morgan, Monterey Institute for International Studies: “ . . . your proposal to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for a new form of dialogue (“Public Talks”) represents a serious, innovative departure from past practice by which political conflicts are represented, defined and treated (or not) in the public arenas of the US and multilateral organizations.”
original letter

Joel Hefley, Republican member of the House from Colorado (1987- 2007) Chair of the House Ethics Committee: " I know how frustrating it can be to have the normal diplomatic process break down with no place else to go . . . I feel that it (Public Talks) should be fully explored. I would therefore encourage the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee to hold hearings to explore the viability of Public Talks."
original letter

 

 

The Question of a Sanctioning Body


A review of the “Opinion Editorials” section on the main site for the Institute for Public Dialogue http://ifpdialogue.org/opinion_editorials.php will reveal that all of the early articles on Public Talks called for this process to be created and overseen by the UN.

As time has gone on and more and more feedback has been received by people involved with the UN and others with foreign policy experience, a simple truth has emerged. The very structure of the UN that allows any of the five permanent Security Council members to veto anything renders this a very difficult obstacle for Public Talks.

Public Talks could be created by any major nation or international organization with adequate financial resources and an established reputation as an “honest broker.”

A very large-scale event that results in the American people supporting Public Talks would create a powerful momentum for this new form of international dialogue.

And here is a key statistic to recognize: Shortly after the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, a Pew Research poll found that 73 percent of Americans favored hearing both sides of issues, even if it meant hearing directly from enemies.







Why Students?
2:34 secs

 


Africa:

Egypt

South Africa

Asia:

India

China

Europe:

Ireland

Italy

Portugal

Spain

Sweden

United Kingdom

North America:

Mexico

United States

Oceania:

Australia

New Zealand

South America:

Argentina

Brazil

Chile

Colombia

Peru




Mr. Doug Turner. Republican gubernatorial candidate for New Mexico and formerly an International Affairs Fellow for the Council on Foreign Affairs:
“I am intrigued and excited about the new concept for public diplomacy that your organization has outlined in its proposal for ‘Public Talks.’ . . .”
original letter

Congresswoman Woolsey, Democratic member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs: “Public Talks is an interesting proposal that should be looked at closely and discussed as an alternative to conflict. . . . Innovative thinking, like that of the Institute, is essential to moving towards a stable and secure future for all the world’s people.”
original letter